| Abstract The paper proposes to view
languages as a form of primordial oral human art form, with each member language,
both present and past, representing variations on an art movement with changes
throughout time. It is further proposed that many languages are identified with
second or graphical art form for the graphical representation of the oral form.
Both forms are the product of the human mind and use different mental abilities
and time frames. The oral component is considered dominate and is acquired during
a child's language acquisition stage of human development which is also responsible
for new languages. Graphical representation forms, however, were designed by adult
scholars and others to expand and make permanent the aspects of oral language
for transactions and other record keeping. Additionally, it is proposed that most
aspects of the oral component (phones, lexicon and syntax) are arbitrary but controlled
by a language coherence which functions almost automatically in the wider aspects
using syntax, grammatical gender and one's mental lexicon. It is axiomatic that
meaning is conveyed not only by dictionary (lexical) descriptions, but also by
suprasegmental aspects, and arrangements of syntactic elements. Coherence breaks
down when human awareness or thought process is evoked in an ever increasing awareness
and ambiguity in thought. But some aspects of syntax such as misplaced modifiers
and phrases but can still be useful in some forms of poetry unthinkingly and drama.
Wars have been ended, careers have been ruined and hearts have been broken because
of what was said or written. Some people are granted particular, specific power
by their society to do things with words. The formal cultural acts of marrying,
naming, inaugurating and condemning to death are achieved through the use of language.
(Mercer 2000:11)
|